My last blog generated a lot of interest. I appreciate the responses. All were kind and friendly. The disagreements were friendly, polite, appreciated, the best of Social media.
Thank you to everyone.
Here are a few more thoughts and questions, based on the blog and responses.
There is a view that the percentage of the dead should have been a percentage of those who served in combat, not of the whole Army.
The dead were whole Army dead. Their deaths occurred all around the world. Not all were combat deaths. They were soldiers who died while serving.
If you take deaths from combat, ie, Killed in action, or died of wounds as a percentage of those who served in the combat area/zone/frontline it would be expected to be higher. It might not be for various reasons. Some are mentioned below.
There are questions though.
Where did combat take place?
Was the combat zone static or fluid?
Between what dates did combat in the combat zone occur?
Was Le Havre in the combat zone?
Did a soldier on a troop ship going to India, serve in a combat zone while the ship was in the Mediterranean?
Did Kitchener die in Combat?
Did the soldiers who died on the Hospital Ship Anglia die in combat?
Did a soldier who died as a result of a bomb dropped from an aircraft in France die in combat?
If he did,
Did a soldier killed by a bomb explosion during the Folkestone bombing die in combat?
Did a soldier shot while in a rear area die “In Combat”?
Then there are the soldiers who died because of illness.
The men who would have died anyway, no matter where they were.
Then there are the men who died on their way to or from the frontline.
I do not have the answers. They are only thoughts.